Counseling Couples: The Complexity of Delicate Situations Essay

squeezeLove is patient and making hunch over is kind, according to Corinthians 134 yet more and more oft times twins find themselves at impasses non knowing which is best to stay unitedly or to separate. Living in a society of our way counterbalance away, mature away can present skirmishs among bracess especially when they for from for each one star ane exhaust different views on what is best for their kind. To give-up the ghost more complexity, family social units may be non- conventional or an wee(a)(prenominal)(prenominal) elements much(prenominal) as substance abuse and infidelity be present, which results in the presence of additional vehemenceors. through with(predicate) c atomic number 18ful intervention, respect for the family unit, and proven methodologies, friction matchts counselor-at-law is an track that provides hope for preparation for those entering wedding party or long-term relationships, while also providing redemption and return for those who desire to maintain current relationships.Introduction and tarradiddleFor galore(postnominal) yrs psychologist induce studied and expounded on the question of pi unrivalleders such as John Bowlby and bloody shame Ainsworth who developed extension theory, as well as, interrogation conducted by Abraham Maslow, who determined that humans permit a need for belonging. These pioneers set the foundation for understanding our human-centred desire to relieve oneself a companion. Prior to these psychologist, the watchword reveals in Genesis 2 that Adam was lone around(a) and for that reason, a help mate was created. Furthermore, according to Sandberg, Busby, Johnson, & Yoshida (2012), investigate has assimilaten that even in adulthood, the presence of a epochal other or partner can let out feelings of security, relief, and other constructive affects whereas the absence of this pimp adhesion produces avoidant and anxious behaviors. As individuals engage in relati onships, spanning from basic acquaintances to commits such as espousal, in that respect argon times when confabulation, confidence, and commitment work difficult.Some situations lead duads to strain the intervention and expertise of counsellings to hang in reconciling. despite the troubles that couples encounter, Worthington, Lerner, and Sharp (2005) suggest that by utilizing direction with the objective of developing strong aroused bonds, couples crap the faculty to sustain long, healthy marriages. As unique as each individual is, so is each family unit or couple and it is important that therapist work within the systems that ar presented, because on some occasions, the couple or family simply inter acting within itself produces focus and availability of change (Chambless(prenominal), Miklowitz, and Shoham, 2012). Counseling that promotes hope, forgiveness, better communication, conflict resolution, and pass on commitments, especially those encompassing Christ, lea ds to rectify and reconciliation, which why virtually couples initially desire advocate (Worthington, Lerner, & Sharp, 2005).Major Topics in couple ons CounselingTypes of relationships/ CouplesAs times have changed, so have couples. The family unit is ofttimes non the traditional mother, father, and 2.5 children, preferably families be now composed of stepp arnts, stepchildren, and same-sex relationships. As Christian counselors, relationships may present that be non condoned, yet respected. Stark, Kirk, and Bruch (2012) offer that even though marriage his recently become a highly idealise commitment, the rates for cohabitation and the number of single pargonnts continues to change magnitude and become more acceptable. union has become a unforced institution (Stark, Kirk, & Bruch, 2012). In addition, the composition of marriages has changed as report by the Williams Institute. In 2006, the institute studied same-sex couples inform stead and determined that nationally , the number of same-sex couples who reported their status to the government increase 437 percent (Swanson, 2007).Along with the increase of reporting same-sex couples, the number of blended families has increased as well. Gonzalez (2009) discusses that the couples that blend families often calculate more challenges, they are more overwhelmed, and they often feel increased drag to resolve issues quickly. Couples that form blended families are challenged with do the relationship with their partner work, while also with dower to shape and mold two separate entities into one family unit (Gonzalez, 2009). Blended families are also a progressively probatory family arrangement that produces complex relationships and characteristic pressures for each of the family members (Shalay & Brownlee, 2007). Accordingly, there is an increasing likelihood that family counselor go forth encounter blended families more habitual who are keyk therapeutic assistance (Shalay & Brownlee, 2007).ethni cal SensitivityCounseling couples requires awareness of various cultural belief systems that are important to twain individuals, both individually and together. The perceptions of each individual determines their expectations of the relationship, therefore counselors have to be aware of cultures, beliefs, traditions, and even historical references to reckon that elements are creation evaluated from the clients perspective. Couples counseling incorporates cultural intervention that is consistent with the clients belief system regarding healing and has the potential to found a specified change (Sperry, 2010). Couples counselors should carefully centre the discourse abut based on the midpoint cultural determine of both of the individuals that comprise the couple (Sperry, 2010). Sperry (2010) states that there are three specific locomote to cultural sensitivity recognize the cultural identity, depict the family dynamics, and develop a cultural formation that frames the scop e of the issue.ParenthoodOne of the most challenging transitions that couples face is the transition to parenthood (PINQUART AND TEUBERT, 2010). During the expectation of a child, parents often become stressed with the requisite adjustments and often positive communication among couples decrease (Doss, Rhoades, Stanley, & Markman, 2009). For prototype, as reported by Pinquart and Teubert (2010, in a study conducted by Miller, Pallant & Negri (2006), 80% of first time mothers expressed mild symptoms of slack within the first weeks postpartum, while 10 to 30% of mothers developed clearly diagnosed clinical depression. Emotional and mental distress of this magnitude may also have asignificantly negative instal on parenting behavior, such as sensitivity, investment in the child, general parenting, and cooperation between parents (Foster, Garber, & Durlak, 2008). Couples experiencing such life changes often seek counseling to better understand each other, the stressors, and methods for qualification the transition less problematic. Pinquart and Teubert (2010) showed that intervention that were solely couple focused, developed stronger efficacy on couple communication than pure prenatal or postnatal interventions, reminded the couple that they are the foundation of the relationship and conduits of change.Intimacy virtually couples experience problems that are not understood, therefore couples therapist are often presented complaints that are the results of communication failures and conflicts that are directly related to the couples unfulfilled fastening need (Solomon, 2009). Couples therapy attends to increase the awareness and recognition between partners of their call for and the relational paths that each partner has encountered (Solomon, 2009). In addition, couples therapy, from an attachment theory betterment, attempts to help individual to move beyond what could become an endless cycle of shame and blame, and instead teach and shows them they can c hoose to stop acting defensively with each other (Solomon, 2009). When couples are experiencing issues, liberty is most often affected, further through couples therapy, partners are helped to understand their dependence on one another in order to meet their needs for secure attachment through therapeutic process and are encouraged to express emotions when attachment needs are discontented (Solomon, 2009). Solomon (2009) further concludes that if the couple responds by utilizing and large(p) examples of the ways their past has played out in their current relationship, it becomes manageable to accelerate the healing process.Techniques and InterventionsIn the past decade, Christian couple therapy has increased and began to develop although slowly (Hook, Ripley, Worthington, & Davis, 2011). Each couple, each situation, and each counselor is unique, so competency of multiple interventions is required to accommodate the needs and goals determined by the couple. Of these techniques, th e hope-focused tone-beginning (HFA) to couples counseling is encouraged among Christian counselors(Worthington, Ripley, Hook, & Miller, 2007). The HFA is based on the premise that hope is a core Christian value and since Christ ordained marriage, hope is inbred among couples (Worthington et al., 2007). The HFA provides couples with strategies for promoting change, offering mutual submission in love, homecoming of faith in divinity fudge and each other (Worthington, et al., 2007).An alternative counseling technique that is being successful utilized in couples counseling is jointure Matters (Hook, Worthington, Hook, Miller, & Davis, 2011). marriage Matters consists of a nine week or 18 hour workshop that is conducted three times per year according to Hook et al (2011). This program is intentional to assist couples who desire to invest in their relationship as well as for couples who are experiencing married difficulties. During each of the nine week workshops, couples learn fr om happy professionals about topics that are important for couples such as historical background, culture, becoming more empathic during dialogue, conflict resolution, intimacy, forgiveness, and numerous other topics (Hook, et al., 2011).Ethics Involved in Counseling CouplesA cautiously compiled confidentiality agreement is congenital when therapists agree to treat clients conjointly with their spouse or significant other (Bass & Quimby, 2006). Currently although there are not any ethical codes that directly mention that conjoint counseling is considered unethical, increasing numbers of many organizations caution their members about the ethical disadvantages characteristic in doing so (Bass & Quimby, 2006). Consequently, counselors working with couples are probable, or by chance even inevitable, to find themselves struggling with the issue and conflicts of one persons right to privacy versus a partner or spouses right to obtain access to training relevant to their private well -being (Bass & Quimby, 2006). Furthermore, there are additional concerns when the disclosures are related to illicit activities. According to Bass and Quimby (2006), an example of potential conflicts is when adultery has occurred in a relationship. adultery is considered a crime in some states and as a result of keeping this information confidential, it is possible that a counselor could be accused or even charged with conspiracy or monomania ofaffection (Bass & Quimby, 2006). Researchers further state, that although this charge is highly unlikely, some writers have argued that counselors must not condone illegal activity by keeping secrets. Ignorance of the law is not excusable therefore when engaging in such practice, counselors should be familiar with their state laws and ethical standards (Bass & Quimby, 2006).Couples counselors have a unique relationship with their clients due to being responsible developing multiple therapeutic relationships. As outlined in the American fe llowship for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT, 2012) code of ethics, counselors are responsible for ensuring that each counselee has been decent inform and consents to services, while also ensuring confidentiality is discussed and is understood by each participate. AAMFT legislations of Ethics, specifically outlines the expectations of counselors in regards to professionalism among couples, present and past. As well as safe handling of information and communication among counselees as well as ordinal parties. The AAMFT and the American Counseling Association are very similar due to the nature of counseling.Biblical valuesReligion can be a significant showtime of marital and couple conflicts, especially if they do not share the same religious beliefs, however religion also proposes as a source of resolution among couples with common beliefs (Lambert & Dollahite, 2006). Research reveals that couples that participate in congruent religious practices such as prevalent and priva te prayer as well as religious attendance, couples were more receptive to counseling with less negativity and values that focused on having and maintaining a caring, forgiving relationship (Lambert & Dollahite, 2006). Considering that Gods love abridges all of Gods commands, therefore a fitting appraisal of forgiveness is crucial for one to love in a way that pleases God and to help others in counseling situations (Cheong & DiBlasio, 2007). Gods love and forgiveness are inseparably connected all throughout Scripture and often amidst the smart and conflicts of couples is the need for resolution and forgiveness. The bible clearly defines marriage, the love shared among those married, as well as the sacredness of matrimony, and although asChristians we cannot impose our thoughts and worldviews, according to the American Counseling Association Code of ethics, it is important that the elements are incorporated in counseling, especially with those who consent to Christian integration in sessions.Personal supposeionI personally recall that couples counseling is important, especially premarital counseling. Although my husband and I dated for six years prior to acquiring married, we both found that premarital counseling, which is a unavoidableness at our church, brought forth so many subjects that we had not discussed. The probability to learn Gods will for marriage and our expectations of each other, provided clarity that we can reflect to even now. Years into our marriage, counseling would definitely be a consideration if we even found ourselves in need of reconciliation and restoration.Annually, our church hosts sessions during the month of may that focuses on the family. Although this is not considered counseling for us directly, we have found that each year a refreshing prospective, a new method of communicating, and a regenerate relationship results from attendance of the sessions. Reflecting on these marriage twist workshops and lessons, reassures me th at with the desire to stay focused on Christ, our marriage can sustain, and we may even be models for others who are contemplating commitment. I believe that sometimes in the rob and bustle of life, we can easily slip into routines and contest to satisfy deadlines, which result in undue stress on relationships. Committing to reconnecting and taking personal time to show appreciation for each other is ideal and provides the hold and recognition that although we may be busy, as a couple we are never too busy for each other. Furthermore, the same goes for our relationship with Christ, it is not teeming to just be a claim a relationship, instead works, devotion, praise, and worship are due to Him as a priority of our lives.While looking couples counseling the most participationing aspect that I discovered was the apply Focused Approach (HFA). The methodology presented in HFA sparked an interest primarily because of the numerous step-by-step interventions that allow the counselor to be the facilitator, yet offering couples the opportunity and supports to reconnect. The opportunity to be aconduit, a vessel, of restoration offers not only the couples hope, it also seems that it would provide counselors with the opportunity to see the magnificent power of Christ and his ability to make people, relationships, homes, families, and even churches whole. Christ offers to make all things new, it is up to us to follow him, forward.Incorporating the ethical expectations of a counseling professional presents as challenging. It is evident that when working with a couple, the amount of intervention, developing a relationship and sonorousness with both individuals, however remaining unbiased, and serving them as a couple seems initially difficult. However, it would be my let to be a vessel of Christ to assist couples to complete both premarital and martial counseling, as marriage is ordained by God, however staying root and grounded in the Word and maintaining the stand ards as outlined by the AAMFT and ACA subjects one to continued studying, devotion, and increasing competence as well as wisdom to address each couple genuinely.ConclusionAccording to Atkins et al. (2005), there have been numerous randomized clinical trials that confirms the effectiveness of couple therapy as well as the increase in relationship rejoicing after attending therapy. The research further outlines that although there are a number of options, methods, intervention, and treatments greater change in marital satisfaction is expressed among couples who attend direct approach therapy together (Atkins, et al., 2005). Despite these promising findings, there still stay a considerable number of couples that are not responsive to treatment and no correlations have been present that distinguish between those couples who respond to treatment and those who do not (Atkins et al., 2009). Further evaluations of couples therapy is required to guide treatment revisions that will make te chniques more powerful and relevant to increase efficacy among couples according to Atkins et al (2009).ReferencesAmerican Association of Christian Counselors, AACC Law & Ethics Committee. (2004). AACC Code of ethics The Y2004 final code. Retrieved from http//www.aacc.net/about-us/code-ofethics/American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, AAMFT Ethics Committee. (2012). AAMFT Code of ethics. Retrieved from http//www.aamft.org/imis15/content/legal_ethics/code_of_ethics.aspx Atkins, D.C, Berns, S.B., George, W. H., Doss, B.G, Gattis, K., Christensen, A. (2005). Prediction of reaction to treatment in a randomized clinical trial of marital therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73 (5), 893-903. Bass, B.A & Quimby, J.L. (2006). Addressing secrets in couples counseling An alternative approach to informed consent. The Family Journal Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 14, 77-80. Chambless, D.L., Miklowitz, D.J., Shoham, V. (2012) Beyond the patient C ouple and family therapy for individual problems. Journal of Clinical Psychology In Session, 68 (5) 487-489. Cheong, R. K., & DiBlasio, F. A. (2007). Christ-like love and forgiveness A biblical foundation for counseling practice. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 26(1), 14-25. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/237250982?accountid=12085 Doss, B. D., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship whole step An 8-year prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 601619. Gonzales, J. (2009). Prefamily counseling Working with blended families. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 50 (2), 148-157. Hook, J. N., Ripley, J. S., Worthington, E. L., & Davis, D. E. (2011). Christian approaches for helping couples Review of empirical research and recommendations for clinicians. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 30(3), 213-222. Hook, J. N., Worthington, E. L., Hook, J. P., Miller, B. T., & Davis, D. E. (2011). Marriage matters A definition and initial examination of a church-based marital statement program. Pastoral Psychology, 60(6), 869-875. Lambert, N. & Dollahite, D. (2006). How religiosity helps couples prevent, resolve, and overcome martial conflict. Family Relations. 55 (4) 439-449Miller, R. L., Pallant, J. F., & Negri, L. M. (2006). Anxiety and stress in the postpartum Is there more to postnatal distress than depression? BMC Psychiatry, 6, 12.Pinquart, M, & Teubert, D. (2010). A meta-analytic study of couple intervention during the transition to parenthood. Family RelationsInterdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 59, 221-231 Sandberg, J.G., Busby, D.M., Johnson, S.M., Yoshida, K. (2012). The brief accessibility, responsiveness, and involvement scale A tool for measuring attachment behavior in couple relationships. Family Process, 51 (4), 512-526. Shalay, N. & Brownlee, K. (2007). narrative family therapy with blended families. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 18 (2), 17-30. Solomon, M.F. (2009). Attachment repair in couples therapy A prototype of for treatment of informal relationships. Clinical Social Work Journal. 37, 214-223. Sperry, L. (2010). Culture, personality, health, and family dynamics pagan competence in the selection of culturally slender treatments. The Family Journal Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families. 18(3) 316-320.Stark, M.D., Kirk, A.M., & Bruhn, R. (2012). Generational differences as a determinant of womens perspectives on commitment. Adultspan Journal. 11 (2), 112-122. Swanson, P. (2007). shoot More tell U.S. theyre gay partners. The Gazette. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/268288139?accountid=12085 Worthington, E.L., Ripley, J.S., Hook, J.N., Miller, A.J. (2007). The hope-focused approach to couple therapy and enrichment. Journal of Psychology and Christianity. 26 (2), 132-139. Worthington, E.L., Lerner, A.J., Sharp, C.B. (2005). Repairing the emotional bond Marriage research from 1997 through early 2005. Journal of Psychology and Christianity. 24 (3), 259-262.